Logo Council For Non-Governmental  Organizations In  Malawi  
 
strategic plan
 
 
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS  
 
CBO Community Based Organisation
CBOs Community Based Organizations
CILIC Civil Liberties Committee
CONGOMA Council for Non-Governmental Organization in Malawi
Dr. Doctor
ES Executive Secretary
GC Governing Council
GoM Government of Malawi
INGO International Non-Governmental Organization
IT Information Technology
NGO Non-Governmental Organization
NORAD Norwegian Aid For Development
PAC Public Affairs Committee
SADC Southern Africa Development Committee
SO Support Organisation
SP Strategic Plan
SWOT Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats
TOR Terms of Reference
ZOOP A German method of planning
 
THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  
 
This document is the Strategic Plan for the Council for Non-Governmental Organisations in Malawi (CONGOMA) for the period 2003-2006. The strategic planning process had several steps including the following:
  • A consultative appraisal exercise.
  • NORAD assessment
  • Stakeholder consultations for strategic planning (done by Salephera Consulting)
  • Stakeholder strategic planning workshop that took place at Sun 'N Sand Holiday Resort in Mangochi from 1 to 3 May 2002
  • Adoption by the Annual General Meeting of CONGOMA
The consultative appraisal was carried out by an external consultant (Gil Enterprise: A Consultative Appraisal 2001) and presents strengths and weaknesses of CONGOMA as perceived by members, donors and Government representatives. The appraisal presents a clear and useful overview of the current state of affairs and provided a basis for the strategic planning process. The report also contains broad recommendations for future actions.
 
The NORAD assessment highlighted the need for CONGOMA to develop a strategic plan and programme operational plan with priorities for the first year of implementing the strategic plan as an active response to challenges presented in the appraisals and consultations.
 
Salephera Consulting conducted a comprehensive desk study and also carried out strategic planning stakeholder consultations with selected representatives of member NGOs and donors. The outputs from these were synthesised and presented to the participants as reference during a stakeholder strategic planning workshop in Mangochi.
 
At this Mangochi workshop an attempt was made to concretise the issues raised in the previous appraisals and raised some issues that were not raised in such appraisals. The Governing Council and the Secretariat of CONGOMA therefore decided to continue the process with a workshop, with an external consultant facilitating it, for representative member organisations. Of importance at this second workshop was rooting the planning in CONGOMA'S current situation and not promote unrealistic expectations.
 
All these processes have now culminated into this Strategic Plan document for CONGOMA, 2003-2006. This Plan presents CONGOMA in perspective, the Organisational Performance Analysis, Goals and Strategies, Organisational Implications and the Implementation of the Plan. What is unique in this strategic plan is that for the first time CONGOMA has clearly spelt out its vision. Again it is clearly spell out that guiding its mission are the Values and Principles that are outlined in this plan.
 
In order to ensure that CONGOMA focuses at relevant priority areas, the Strategic Plan was presented to the 2003 Annual General Meeting of CONGOMA. The 2003 Annual General Meeting unanimously adopted the Strategic Plan with a clear focus at the three strategic areas: Capacity Building, Networking/Co-ordination and Advocacy/Mediation.
 
CHAPTER ONE: CONGOMA IN PERSPECTIVE  
 
A). Introduction And Background
CONGOMA is a membership organization of both local and international NGOs, with diverse interests and needs, working in a cross section of sectors and representing both secular and religious groups.
 
The organization has evolved from being a quasi-government to an autonomous institution supported by its members; from a membership base of NGOs working in service delivery, emergency and relief work to a membership organization working beyond service delivery, emergency and relief to include human rights, democracy, good governance and general development.
 
Given the above situation, CONGOMA's activities called for the development of a systematic strategic framework that would ensure that such activities were of relevance to its membership. A major attempt to develop such a framework was done in 1998 covering the period 1998-2001 and addressing areas of interest and relevance to member organizations. However, the implementation of this Strategic Framework was never realized due to lack of funds, weak organizational capacity and divisions among the membership with regard to ownership of the institution.
 
It, therefore, became necessary to develop yet another Strategic Framework to guide the activities of CONGOMA because of several reasons: -
 
  • The 1998-2001 Strategic Framework, though not implemented, has expired.
  • The improvement in leadership and accountability system in CONGOMA.
  • The NGO operational environment has experienced fundamental developments with the enactment of the NGO Act and Decentralization Act.
  • The growing trend to engage and consult non-state actors (including NGOs) in planning and implementing co-operation projects and programmes to combat poverty.
  • The challenges posed by HIV/AIDS, the observance of the Rule of Law and Human Rights.
B). CONGOMA's Vision
CONGOMA is inspired by the vision of sustained strong and vibrant Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) working in a conducive and collaborative environment in which a culture of accountability and good governance is entrenched and the rights of every citizen are respected and promoted to reduce poverty and enhance sustainable socio-economic development in Malawi.
 
C). CONGOMA's Mission
CONGOMA exists to motivate, enhance and maximize the potential and actual impact of member NGOs in articulating and implementing sustainable socio-economic development to reduce poverty in Malawi through mutual support and networking with all interested stakeholders
 
D). CONGOMA's Roles And Mandate
With reference to the NGO Law, CONGOMA Constitution and the last Strategic Plan document, the following are the aspects of the roles and mandate of CONGOMA. Any future strategies will build on this understanding of the organisation's mandate.
 
The official mandate of CONGOMA according to the NGO Law outlines the following objectives:
  • To promote an enabling environment for NGO activities.
  • To promote and facilitate coordination, collaboration and cooperation between the NGO community, Government, donor community and commercial sector in Malawi.
  • To further the standing of NGOs as competent, professional and suitable agents of development.
  • To support NGOs to become institutionally strong.
  • To assist NGOs carry out their functions under this Act.
E). CONGOMA's Core Values And Principles
As a membership organization, whose members cut across all sectors and working with grassroots' organizations, we are guided by the following values and principles: -
  1. Unity in the diversity of our members whose work is "grassroots' value-driven".
  2. Ability to work with our Government and other stakeholders while maintaining an independent and sometimes critical stance.
  3. Legitimacy in society on the basis of our membership base and the NGO Act.
  4. People-centred development in which gender, equality and equity, peace, love; justice and sustainable use of resources are the basis of socio-economic development.
  5. Enhanced NGO institutional development through sharing of the abundant skills and experiences of member NGOs.
  6. Integrity and professionalism of our member NGOs through democratic, transparent and accountable structures.
  7. Political Non-Partisanship and respect for the Rule of Law and Human Rights.
  8. Respect for the autonomy of our member organizations.
These principles and values are a result of a participatory process involving CONGOMA staff, its governance bodies and a broad membership representative during the Strategic Planning process. These principles and values provide a basis for: a poverty free strategy; partnership with those affected by and interested in reducing poverty; addressing issues of mutual respect, humanity, equity and justice, accountability, solidarity, courage and conviction.
 
To achieve the above vision and mission, CONGOMA will play a leading role in creating Partnerships and Networks. Building on our positioning as the NGO Co-ordinating body in Malawi, our interventions will be guided by our Facilitation and Advocacy roles between NGOs on the one hand and decentralized government structures, the private sector, donors and other stakeholders on the other.
 
CHAPTER TWO: ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS  
 
In this step, CONGOMA's external and internal environments were assessed with the purpose of explicating (coming up with) the internal strengths and weaknesses of the organisation in relation to its external opportunities and threats.
 
The Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) analysis clarified the nature of "tension" fields within which CONGOMA exists by juxtaposing good and bad, present and future.
 
Assessments of the SWOTS drew attention to issues and information that obligate people in CONGOMA to move beyond their job descriptions and focused on aspects that bridge the organization to its environment.
 
The external environmental assessment of CONGOMA focused on forces and trends in four categories: political, economic, social and technological. It also looked at actors and stakeholders who are actual or potential collaborators and or competitors.
 
The internal environment assessment included resources (inputs): salaries (remuneration), supplies, and physical infrastructure, number of personnel, present strategy (process) and performance (outputs). The SWOT analysis results are presented below:
 
A). Strengths of CONGOMA
  • Government's and other stakeholders' recognition of CONGOMA as legitimate NGO coordinating body in Malawi.
  • CONGOMA's foundation, mandate and pillars being its member NGOs.
  • CONGOMA philosophy of harmonising NGO operations in Malawi.
  • Diverse fields of specialisation or operation by member NGOs
  • Large number of functioning and legally instituted NGOs with a lot of resources.
  • Vision-oriented secretariat
  • CONGOMA's non-partisanship.
  • CONGOMA and its members role as intermediaries or change agents in sustainable development.
  • Dedicated leadership in the Governing Council and at secretariat
B). Weaknesses of CONGOMA
  • Unadequate human and financial capacity.
  • Lack of updated information on NGOs and their geographical spread.
  • Less commitment from member NGOs in supporting CONGOMA Secretariat for example through payment of membership fees.
  • Weak regional structures for the North and Centre to facilitate easy access to members in these regions.
  • Limited initiatives to facilitate effective collaboration of its members.
  • Competition among members instead of collaboration
  • Limited membership understanding of their roles in CONGOMA.
  • Weak fundraising and narrow financial base.
  • Irregular consultative meetings.
  • Weak governance structures.
C). Opportunities for CONGOMA
  • The greater need for harmonising NGO operations in Malawi.
  • Mandatory membership through the NGO Law.
  • Room to learn from experienced international NGOs.
  • CONGOMA's knowledge of its problems and other issues affecting it.
  • Increasing NGO membership in Malawi
  • Increasing recognition of NGOs' role in development
  • Increasing interest in Donors to support NGOs.
  • Existence of similar organisations or networks at Regional levels (e.g. SADC).
  • NGO law in place for legitimising the sector
  • Possibilities of fiscal incentives for all NGOs.
  • Legal designation as an NGO co-ordinating body.
D). CONGOMA's Threats
  • The funding sympathy for institutions implementing projects/programmes is higher than that of institutions coordinating aspects of development. This calls for creativity and innovativeness on the part of CONGOMA
  • The political climate in Malawi remains unpredictable.
  • Donor dependence
  • Absence of NGO policy document.
E). CONGOMA's Major Issues And Challenges
  • CONGOMA is suffering from constraints and gaps in almost all areas considered important for an organisation: Few staff, weak governance, meagre funding, weak ownership and support from members. The challenge for CONGOMA is to reverse the trends.
  • There are unclear strategies, few activities and inadequate delivery of services. On the other hand there have been positive improvements over the last two years under the leadership of the current Executive Secretary. The challenge is to decide how and where to start the process of change. To find and clearly define the strategies for an effective, efficient and professional organisation and build on the positive improvements registered so far. In a complex environment like the one CONGOMA is in with high level of uncertainty, it is sometimes better to move slowly, a little bit at a time and make sure that changes can be made along the way.
  • CONGOMA has gone through a very important process that of coming up with the strategic plan document. A well-formulated strategy document alone will most likely not serve the interests of CONGOMA and its members. The challenge is to combine strategic planning with action -a short-term operational plan to demonstrate and test ideas and objectives. It is necessary for CONGOMA to discuss and agree on direction (what CONGOMA is), basic priorities and define more clearly diffuse concepts like advocacy, capacity building, mediation and others. At the end of it all CONGOMA should translate all its intentions into action. Another challenge is for CONGOMA to continue demonstrating and proving to members, donors and government that a change has taken place and that the secretariat is able to deliver. CONGOMA must quickly be result-oriented. Hence the programmes should consist of and preferably start with a few projects that can be implemented with a high chance of success, visibility and relevance. In addition, some more long term and complex activities could be started simultaneously.
  • CONGOMA has some success stories to its credit such as good management system, donor confidence, government support, and improved membership fees payment. The challenge is for CONGOMA to build its future on these success stories and gradually develop and expand over time. This will build the organisation, its credibility and viability, which will demonstrate new commitment and attract more donor support especially in the initial period of implementation of this plan.
  • There is now the NGO law, which directly impinges on the operations of CONGOMA. The challenge is for CONGOMA to find its rightful place in as far as the implementation of this law is concerned. There is need to answer some questions about the law and its effect on the operations and development of NGOs in the country.
  • The constitution of CONGOMA stipulates that membership is voluntary. What this means is that while some NGOs opt not to belong to CONGOMA some of those that have chosen to be members are not giving their full support. The Challenge is to review this position and categorise membership and benefits based on their ability to meet the set membership obligations.
F). CONGOMA's Strategic Priorities
CONGOMA exists for its members therefore it is pre-occupied by activities of and for its members. However, CONGOMA is not in a position to play all roles. It will set clear priorities and in principle it can do a lot, but it has made a choice to concentrate on a few at a time for purposes of efficiency and bearing in mind its capacity. What is important is to select a few fundamental priorities, do them and do them well which means to resist the temptation and pressures to do all the other useful activities. CONGOMA undertakes to concentrate on the following strategic areas:
 
1. Capacity Building
Under this strategic area, CONGOMA will:
A. Facilitate organisation development processes for NGOs

- CONGOMA will help NGOs develop their own Strategic Plans to guide their operations. It will also develop manuals on NGO Self-Understanding, Proposal Writing and Financial Procedures.

B. Facilitate understanding on national policies and regional structures

- CONGOMA will identify key and relevant national policies and regional structures that have a bearing on NGO activities and national development. These policies and structures will then be repackaged into user-friendly information kits.

C. Facilitate twinning of well established NGOs with upcoming NGOs

- CONGOMA will facilitate the development of partnerships of enrichment between well established and the upcoming NGOs. This will involve exposure to documented best practices, NGO Week, local and regional study tours.

- CONGOMA will motivate young professionals to join the NGO Sector through internship programs between NGOs and education institutions. It will develop guidelines for internship in the NGO Sector.

2. Networking And Program Coordination
Under this Strategic Area, CONGOMA will:
A. Facilitate the formation of sector networks and strengthen existing ones

- CONGOMA will foster the working together of NGOs among themselves and with other CSOs. CONGOMA will build synergies by forming new sector networks in the areas they do not exist; consult and work together with existing networks.

B. Improve information flow between member NGOs and between NGOs and Secretariat

- CONGOMA will solicit activity reports from member NGOs and will send its activity and other reports to its members in such other forms as newsletter, annual reports, bronchures, kits and on the website.

- CONGOMA will establish Programs Committee whose membership will be from the member NGOs to create a sense of ownership of CONGOMA Secretariat.

C. Strengthen linkages between CONGOMA and other Civil Society networks.

- CONGOMA will consult and closely work together with other Civil Society networks such as PAC, trade unions. This is meant to build a unified critical mass of the Civil Society.

D. Facilitate staff exchange programs among NGOs

- CONGOMA will facilitate the enhancement of skills and build trust among NGOs through staff exchange programs.

E. Develop and update database at its Secretariat.

- CONGOMA will facilitate access to centralized information on and related to NGOs and other stakeholders' work. This will involve procurement of new computers and its accessories, development of a website, procurement of additional telephone lines for fax and internet and improvement of the information resource centre.

F. Facilitate regional consultative meetings

- CONGOMA will enhance interface of NGOs and its visibility at regional levels by holding regular regional meetings and establishment of NGO Service Centres.

G. Facilitate NGO geographical distribution

- CONGOMA will create awareness on NGO programs and project areas for the facilitation of spatial distribution. To do this, CONGOMA will produce an NGO District Map.

 
3. Advocacy
Under this strategic area CONGOMA will:
A. Facilitate the creation of an enabling environment for NGO work in the country.

CONGOMA will engage government towards the development of NGO policy and review of relevant statutes.

B. Facilitate a study on NGO Contributions to development aimed at creating a proper

profile of NGOs in Malawi and contribute towards a better understanding and appreciation of NGO work in Malawi.

G). How Will Congoma Be Funded
Sources of income will be identified always maintaining the balance between internal and external resources. Ways to raise more funds to enhance long-term sustainability will be explored. Currently CONGOMA is heavily dependent on donor funding with membership fees constituting about 20% of the total operating budget.
 
Another source of income for CONGOMA is the sale of commercial services. During the period of this strategic plan, NORAD as a donor agency is being requested to consider funding the core support and some core activities for the institution, for at-least three years, while CONGOMA is developing a strategy for sustaining itself, as well as maintaining its visibility. At the same time CONGOMA will be approaching other donors to support the other core activities.
 
Members will be approached to increase their fees to CONGOMA. International and some local NGOs will be approached to consider giving financial support to CONGOMA over and above their annual subscriptions. One international NGO is already doing this much to the appreciation of the Governing Council and the secretariat.
 
In the long term, it should be feasible to introduce a more differentiated system for membership fees. There are currently only two rates: one for international and another for national NGOs. Large national and international NGOs should be in a position to pay much more than small indigenous NGOs. The aim will be to fund the core budget (for instance 3-4 professional staff + support staff) with contributions from the members.
 
As a means of sustaining itself, CONGOMA will in the three year period approach donors to fund the administrative operational costs as a relief to the membership fees. As this is being done the income from the membership fees will be deposited in a bank account to earn more money. On the other hand CONGOMA will approach the international NGOs to make a once-off donation on top of their normal affiliation fees.
 
CONGOMA will also consider commercial alternatives - selling products and services to members and external clients in order to generate extra income. This is not an easy route to sustainability and will require both up front investments and preferably the establishment of a semi-autonomous commercial unit (a separate cost centre) attached to CONGOMA secretariat.
 
Given all this support and having all the mechanisms in place, CONGOMA will rise to its expected level of efficiency.
 
CHAPTER THREE: GOALS AND STRATEGIES  
 
CONGOMA's goals, strategies and objectives for the secretariat will be developed in the following areas:
 
  • Improved organisation and Management
  • An enhanced service to our members
  • Realise staff potential
  • Improve financial planning and control
A). Improved organisation and management
Member organisations of CONGOMA have made a number of recommendations concerning its Secretariat and management. The proposed changes are intended to improve the effectiveness of the organisation, and are currently being considered by the Governing Council and the secretariat.
 
CONGOMA will pursue the following strategies to improve the way it organises and manages itself:
  • Remain an autonomous agency independent of government.
  • Publish an annual work programme together with a review of achievements and progress made during the previous year.
  • Strengthen the regional committees and aim to establish regional offices so that they are able to perform support functions to members and liase with other stakeholders.
  • Introduce a system of performance management and open appraisal where all divisions and sections operate according to annual work plans in the secretariat.
  • Ensure that all staff with management responsibilities receive training in Management.
  • Delegate more management responsibilities to department managers who will also delegate more responsibilities to their staff.
B). Enhanced service provision to our members
CONGOMA exists to provide support services to its members. It is vital that support services remain close to policy debates and understand member needs in order to provide the best service and the most relevant support and information.
 
CONGOMA will pursue the following strategies to provide an enhanced service:
  • Raise awareness of CONGOMA products and services by continuing to give priority to paper-based publications, but also exploiting opportunities such as the media, the Internet, open days, and our regional and networking structure.
  • Include our mission statement in all our publications.
  • Formally assess the needs of our members for services and support users in each major area of NGO work in Malawi.
  • Establish technical working groups of member organisations and specify key areas.
  • Produce and maintain a directory of members
  • Develop and maintain an electronic databank of NGOs.
  • Develop methods for electronic dissemination, including the Internet, CD-ROM, and other methods.
  • Be proactive in marketing the services and products and image of CONGOMA.
  • Ensure our staff members are equipped to produce quality services through specialised training.
  • Establish Service Centre with such facilities as telephones, computer, Internet, photocopying and library.
  • Create the NGO District Impact Area Map.
C). Realise staff potential
Staff members are the most important resource of CONGOMA and if the secretariat is to meet its aims it is crucial that staff members are trained to their full potential. Currently the number of professionally trained staff is relatively small compared to the tasks that the office has to perform, and it is necessary to develop the skills of all staff at all levels. High priority will be given to training, and to developing staff with flexible and transferable skills.
 
CONGOMA will pursue the following strategies to realise staff potential:
  • Ensure that all staff agree with their managers on personal development plans each year inline with our goals
  • Reformulate the staff-training programme to ensure that it meets the career development needs of all cadres and grades.
  • Introduce a policy of job rotation where necessary and appropriate.
  • Improve the management capabilities of staff by developing a programme of management training.
  • Design and implement an induction programme for all new staff members who join the organisation's secretariat
  • Identify key competencies required for professionalism and incorporate this into the training plan.
  • Establish and publicise a human resource policy including an internal code of conduct procedures regarding privileges and allowances.
D). Improve financial planning and control
Financial resources are limited in Malawi for coordinating organisations. Therefore CONGOMA will carefully prioritise, manage and utilise its available resources. Where budgeted funds are only allocated for specific activities, additional effort and care will be applied.
 
CONGOMA will pursue the following strategies to improve financial planning and control:
  • Allocate and monitor funds through an internal Expenditure Management Committee that shall meet every month.
  • Implement a system of quarterly work plan and financial planning for all the departments.
  • As far as possible, decentralise financial management by allocating funds to departments to carry out agreed priority activities in their work plans.
  • Improve accounting procedures including the computerisation of accounts.
  • Utilise funds as efficiently as possible when procuring goods and services, managing fieldwork and travel.
  • Improve the transparency and involvement of department staff in the budgeting process
E). Governance And Management
CONGOMA's governance and management structure comprises the following:
  • General Assembly (Composed of all associating members and proprietors)
  • Board of Trustees (Provided for in the current constitution as custodians of the organisation's resources).
  • Board of Directors (with its own board committees for finances and administration etc)
  • Secretariat (with management functions and authority for day-to-day implementation)
  • Regional Committees (Composed of member organisations units in each Region)
  • Networks (Sectoral interest groups of member organisations)
This structure ensures that CONGOMA is a more professional and effective organisation. Greater authority is been given to the secretariat in order for it to make management decisions in a timely manner. The bureaucracy is avoided and roles and responsibility of each organ of the structure will be clearly defined to enhance functions.
 
F). Specific Objectives
CONGOMA will develop specific objectives in its annual operation plan from the following areas:
  • Capacity Building at member NGO and Secretariat levels.
  • Networking and Program Co-ordination
  • Advocacy
 
CHAPTER FOUR: ORGANISATIONAL IMPLICATIONS  
 
In the 2003 - 2006 planning years, CONGOMA will endeavour to raise professional standards and achieve and sustain effective decision-making. This implies that there will be need to change the way certain things have been done to reflect the changing operational plans and needs.
 
A). Human Resources
CONGOMA will develop a program that will prepare staff psychologically for the up-coming organizational changes. The program will be designed in such a way that it psychologically and sociologically re-engineers staff from the 'laissez-faire' culture to a more professional and productive business-like culture.
 
1. Recruitment

All new staff will be recruited following a transparent system of advertising, interviews and selection guided by the principle of "equal opportunity' employer. Staffing levels will be rationalized in line with departmental work plans.

2. Remuneration and Performance Management

· A competitive performance based remuneration package will be designed in order to maintain a highly motivated staff working to their full potential.

· CONGOMA will adopt an open performance appraisal system in which performers are rewarded through either promotion or bonuses. A vital tool in appraising staff will be annual individual work plans generated from departments and sectional work plans. This reward system will be more effective as CONGOMA is an autonomous organisation.

3. Motivation
CONGOMA will put in place a mechanism that will maintain a highly motivated staff working to their full potential. This will be achieved through the following incentives:
  • Equitable training
  • Performance based promotions
  • Job rotation (where appropriate)
  • Job empowerment (the one day boss)
  • Job enrichment (broadening ones span of control)
  • Bonuses (performance based)
  • Attachment to other organisations and offices
  • Study tours
  • Coaching and mentoring (within teams)
4. Code Of Conduct
CONGOMA will enforce the NGO CODE of Conduct as part of the implementation of the NGO Legislation in line with our core values as an autonomous organisation. All member organisations will be issued with the Code of Conduct.
 
5. Training
CONGOMA will develop an equitable and need-based training programme for the professional growth and development of our human resources.
 
B). Financial Management Guidelines For CONGOMA
CONGOMA will strive to be self-sufficient and self-financing. There will be greater need for efficiency and effectiveness as well as a vigorous and aggressive strategy for marketing CONGOMA products and services.
 
The financial management practices of CONGOMA shall be of high standard and aim to strengthen institutional capacity and sustainability. In managing its financial affairs CONGOMA shall:
  • When negotiating with funders on grants and or contracts, ensure that the terms and conditions of funding agreements and the procedures and timetable for reporting are mutually acceptable;
  • Only pursue or accept grants or contracts that:
    • Are fully consistent with CONGOMA's mission and objectives and do not cause its identity, integrity, methods and activities to be distorted, subverted, or corrupted;
    • Do not compromise CONGOMA's independence
    • Do not place more responsibility on CONGOMA than the organisation can manage;
  • Seek to avoid dependence on single, narrow or insecure sources of funding or contracts. Whenever possible CONGOMA income bases will be broad and orientated to long-term sustainability. Other means of achieving such sustainability will include developing and capitalizing upon CONGOMA's specialist expertise and skills
  • Ensure that CONGOMA's own fundraising efforts do not undermine the viability and sustainability of its member organisations
  • In preparing budgets and costing, ensure that the full organisational and administrative costs are recognized and included and adequate resources obtained to meet them
  • Have adequate and appropriate procedures for financial review and monitoring
  • Ensure that funds provided are always used for their intended purpose.
C). Logical Framework

· CONGOMA will develop a Programme Plan of Operation as a step forward towards implementation of this Strategic Plan. The logical framework will be the master plan for all activities to be carried out in the next three years. The log frame will ensure accountability and transparency apart from being used as a yardstick in monitoring progress towards the achievement of the agreed goals and objectives for the 2003 - 2006 planning years.

· CONGOMA will prioritise our secretariat activities when developing departmental and sectional work plans from the log frame.

D). Transparency And Accountability

· CONGOMA will strengthen transparency and accountability in all our endeavours with respect to budgeting, recruitment, staff development and allocation of resources.

· CONGOMA will strengthen Internal Procurement and Expenditure Monitoring Systems.

· CONGOMA will strengthen its communication and information sharing with all our members and stakeholders.

 
CHAPTER FIVE: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN  
 
A). Implementation And Capabilities
Strategy that remains on paper is of little use. CONGOMA will strengthen the operating systems, procedures and technical capabilities for putting the strategy into effect. This raises, among other questions, that of communications. The failure to communicate important choices to staff will mean that no one in the organisation (with the exception of planners and managers) will adhere to the strategy chosen.
 
Activities such as program planning and control, inventory management, quality improvement and staff development, as well as leadership and management style, will be critical to the successful implementation of the CONGOMA Strategy.
 
There will be need to develop or strengthen competencies for adapting the new strategy to new opportunities and constraints. No strategy is valid forever, and the rapid pace of change in Malawi and indeed the world and its environment means that strategy formulation and review must be an ongoing process.
 
There is clear need for a monitoring, or 'early warning" system for detecting trends, events and ideas that may lead to a change in CONGOMA's corporate strategy. Once again, internal management may have neither the time nor the detachment to undertake this task properly. The organisation's management system, including procedures for auditing and redefining strategy, will be flexible enough to make adaptation possible. This means in particular, encouraging people in all CONGOMA structures, departments and sections for marketing, fundraising, research and development and other sections to "keep their eyes and ears constantly open" for signals and ideas that may have a bearing on strategy and should lead to its modification sooner or later.
 
Successful implementation of CONGOMA'S strategic plan will require full support from the following key players:
  • Member Organisations who will collaborate, network and link CONGOMA secretariat.
  • General Public that plays an important role in providing feedback.
  • The Government
  • Donors
B). Assessing Impact
Continuous assessing of the impact of the strategic plan is a crucial component, requiring the participation of all of CONGOMA's development partners in various ways. It should be stressed that the impact assessment process as an accountability system is first and foremost for CONGOMA (comprised of its members), though it is equally important for the consortium's partners including Government and donors.
 
The impact assessment framework is therefore responding to 4 main objectives
  • Assessing the impact of CONGOMA's work as outlined in the strategic plan
  • Organizational strengthening and institutional learning
  • Program planning and management
  • Meeting accountability standards: public, financial, legal, policies
Based on the principles of participation, accountability, learning and flexibility, the impact assessment system will comprise the following essential components and features:
  • Setting clear objectives and activities in line with the strategies in the plan
  • The selection of relevant indicators for each impact area (objectives and activities)
  • Collecting information/data (quantitative and qualitative) relevant to the set indicators
  • Analysing and interpreting the collected information/data
  • Presenting the information/data collected in a simple and appropriate manner
  • Using the information to improve CONGOMA's work and future plans
Indicators will be identified at the stage of project design and planning, and a wide variety of information collection tools will be used depending on the type of objectives and related activities. For example indicators for financial management systems would be different from those used to capture progress on institutional capacity building
 
For example:
 
Objective (1): Enhance financial systems and accountability within CONGOMA
Possible indicator: User-friendly financial management and accountability systems developed and being used.
 
Objective (2): Enhance institutional, technical, management and financial capacity of development institutions (member organizations).
Possible indicator: Number of self-reliant development institutions with full-fledged institutional and operational capacity.
 
Information capture, analysis, reporting and dissemination will be done in various but simple ways using written, audio and visual means for wider use by and benefit of CONGOMA's members, partners and other interested parties within and outside Malawi.
 
Four major levels of monitoring indicators will be considered in the overall Impact Assessment Process. These are:
Inputs: use of resources (by CONGOMA secretariat and possibly members where they are involved in a particular activity). Such resources could be financial, (e.g. expenses) human (e.g. personnel or consultants) and capital (e.g. vehicles, computers).
These could be simply tracked through financial records, audits and expenditure returns.
 
Outputs: refer to the services or performance (quantity and quality) achieved by using the inputs. Outputs are usually related to the effective and efficient use of inputs. For example, an output of a strategy planning process could be - a rolling strategic plan.
 
Outcomes: refer to the effects of services provided or performance, (quantity and quality). Outcomes are related to the inputs and outputs but are also influenced by other factors, usually beyond the direct control of the organization. An example of an outcome for CONGOMA using its strategic plan could be: - financial viability of CONGOMA and members being enabled to have adequate institutional capacity.
 
Impact: usually refers to the effects of welfare conditions/indicators (due to the combined use of inputs, outputs and outcomes). They usually point to changes in people's lives, e.g. reduced poverty and better living standards. The impact of an organization like CONGOMA and its members can also be expressed in terms of achieving mission goals - that is: why the organizations exist and do what they do.
 
Ideally, the completed strategic plan will have for each objective an indicator (or more) that will be used to measure progress.
 
The Impact Assessment system will recognize and implement specific donor requirements in addition to the routine monitoring and evaluation processes. These include periodic reports, audits, financial returns/statements, reviews/evaluations based on agreed standards and frequencies. For example there may be a need for a mid-term and terminal review or evaluation of a certain component or set of activities of the strategic plan. Participatory review and reflection exercises (PRRs) will also be used to assess the impact of CONGOMA's work. The PRRs will enable CONGOMA's members and partners, to contribute their views about work progress, lessons and suggest improvements.
 
Reports, evaluation and review documents will highlight achievements against indications (input, output, outcomes and impact), using certain assumptions. The level of emphasis will depend on the type of objectives and activities implemented. Impact assessment processes of member organizations will also serve as input to the overall CONGOMA Impact Assessment system/framework. For example, reports and evaluation outputs could be shared with CONGOMA and used to illustrate progress being made by member organizations. The intention though is not to fully report on what member organizations are doing, but rather to illustrate what member NGOs are achieving.
 
C). Risk Assessment, Implications And Management
The risk assessments presented below are based on an analysis of the strategic plan, the operating context and environment, and the availability of optimum human, physical and financial resources. Risk factors will be monitored closely as the strategic plan is being implemented, and necessary measures will be taken to minimise their impact.
 
Political instability, leading to and after Parliamentary and Presidential elections set for June 2004.
(Risk of civil unrest, conflict and litigations)
Medium to low. Big issue if the constitution is amended to enable the President seek a 3rd term in office, Constitutional change for a 3rd term likely, though the president has vowed to maintain peace and stability in the country at all cost. Has already banned demonstrations. Closely monitor the situation. Work closely with partners on civic education.Advocate peace and dialogue, rather than confrontation and political conflict
The effects of HIV/AIDS on staff, and partners including communities.
(Considerable time and resources spent on caring for the infected and affected, away from direct development project inputs).
Medium to high. The current prevalence rate is high at 16% (from 14% less than 2 years ago). Big impact on poor communities and organizations either infected or affected or both This is a continuing reality. The slow rate of behaviour change, poor access to drugs and increasing poverty will prevail in the medium to longer term. The government, donors and other players recognize this issue. More collaborative work with partners, with focus on prevention and care. Greater advocacy for access to drugs. Better integrate HR/OD/HIV/AIDS to maintain a healthy and stable work force
Effects of emergencies(Local and regional)
(Draught and floods are recurrent. There is also potential for spill over effects of regional conflicts and hunger)
Medium to high. Floods & droughts disastrous in recent years. Malawi now experiencing serious food deficit. Inadequate National response capacity. Increased number of refugees Floods or drought are likely to reoccur given the trend in the past years and food security is still a critical issueThe peace process in the DRC and Angola is not quite over, and the region is potentially volatile to conflicts. Improve capacity for disaster response and preparedness among organisations and partners.Greater collaboration with government and partners in disaster response and food security initiatives
Inadequate Funding from local and international sources global recession and increased operational costs (e.g. fuel)
(Two main issues are inadequate or limited donor funding and increased cost of operations).
Medium to high.Effects of the USA September 11th terrorist attacks and the withdrawal of Danida affected some NGOs. Global recession and donor apathy would reduce NGO funds. Costs of operations may also increase Global/local forces may affect development aid from rich countries, to NGOs and government. Possible global recession and the impact on the future cost of operations (services, materials, and fuel) are a continuing threat. More diversification of funding base including local sources; Develop and implement sound funding strategies;Demonstrate good results and high level accountability;Monitor trends in the world economy & their impact on our work; and respond to effects
Limited collective will among member organizations and negative perception and misconceptions of CONGOMA
(Main concerns refer to the current lack of critical mass support and misunderstandings around CONGOMA's role and achievements)
Medium. Members and non-members alike often question the value and effectiveness of CONGOMA.Secretariat usually confused with the actual consortium. Non payment of membership fees is a drawback as is non attendance of meetings Very likely for the short to medium term; several NGOs still not yet registered with CONGOMA, despite the legal requirement.It will take time to clarify CONGOMA's role to members and other stakeholders. Building support for CONGOMA requires continuous efforts, especially its members Vigorously solicit necessary support from members and other stakeholders to implement the strategic plan. Need to raise profile based on comparative advantageVigorously seek buy in of members looking at incentives; possibly screen and retain active members
Poor/negative response to change and divergent partner approaches
(This broadly affects all organisations, staff and partners at various levels of engagement)
Low to medium. The shift to policy work, Rights Based Approach to development and partnership need constant orientationAt all levels This is a reality. The organisations will continue to introspect and change.Both staff and partners need to be adequately brought on board & at a good pace Provide staff and partners with a clear understanding of the changes/approaches;Go through change processes together. Regular review and learning from lessons
Political and policy constraints to advocacy and development work
(Concern mainly about NGO-government relations; policy effects on NGO work, e.g. the perception of certain Government officers politicians of NGOs; Unfavourable Tax regimes; the NGO Law and how certain NGOs perceive it)
Low to medium. Little distinction by many politicians regarding different types of NGOs.The NGO Law is perceived by many NGOs as a means of control over NGOs and their activities; The regulation on duty and tax still considered unfavourable by several NGOs. As Civil society becomes more vocal on issues of transparency and accountability, the more some politicians & government officers feel challenged and tend to take offence The government’s plans to implement the NGO Law and the new Tax Regimes on NGOs are still being challenged as against the interests of NGOs Further clarify our role and be consistent in communicating our organisational identity;Promote healthy relationships with government and political authorities;Continue to raise our profile & form strong alliances to address and protect our interestsSupport our staff and partners when they get into drawn trouble.
 
D). Monitoring And Evaluation
Each year a detailed work plan and budget will be produced. After each quarter a financial report will be produced and submitted to Finance Committee for their consideration. As stated in the implementation modalities, bi-annual report highlighting progress towards achievement of the set targets for the major activities will be produced. These reports will be submitted to the Governing Council, members and donors. The Secretariat will also prepare an annual report on its own activities including a financial report.
 
The Governing Council will review the narrative bi-annual reports and confirm that they are in line with the strategic plan.
 
There will be a Mid-Term Review of the implementation of this Strategic Plan in 2005.
 
<
ANNEX 1: STRATEGIC PLAN'S CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS  
 
A). Local Perspectives
The Malawi Government is currently facing the daunting challenge of delivering the expectations of its people, who are still dealing with the ravages of poverty. Malnutrition and hunger remain widespread; a host of diseases including HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and other infectious diseases threaten the health and lives of the population.
 
Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs), as citizen groups, are well placed not only to bring the perspectives and concerns of citizens to the poverty reduction development process; but also to mobilize considerable resources to improve human well being and contribute towards poverty reduction.
 
Government recognizes the role of NGOs in poverty reduction and it has openly expressed interest in developing partnerships and collaboration with NGOs and other non-state actors. However, the NGOs are often challenged on their legitimacy in terms of their constituency from where they derive their legitimacy. CONGOMA's membership base provides some form of constituency and thus a stronger basis to facilitate the interface between NGOs and the state. In addition, the NGO Law and Code of Conduct provide a sanctioned mandate for NGO visibility to tackle Malawi's development and poverty challenges.
 
B). Regional And Sub-Regional Perspectives
The fight against poverty is taking on a much sharper concern for national governments, regional and sub-regional institutions and organizational forces with business and civil society across the globe. Within Southern and Eastern Africa, national governments, regional organizations and civil society formations like SADC, COMESA, EAC, MWENGO, OSISA, EISA, etc are forging close linkages around specific aspects of the poverty issue. Dimensions such as regional migration, regional trade, democracy and good governance, the impact of HIV/AIDS and gender issues have implications for poverty profiles in the region as a whole.
 
CONGOMA believes that increasingly there are more opportunities to achieve meaningful co-operation in fighting poverty within the emerging and existent regional bodies than in larger international intergovernmental process like the United Nations. CONGOMA would therefore like to promote closer involvement of NGOs and Civil Society organizations with these regional governance structures.
 
The participation of civil society and NGOs around poverty issues is envisaged at a number of levels; from political dialogue on issues of human rights and democracy, to consultations on resource allocation to fight poverty both at national and regional levels. The importance that poverty issues have assumed in the region, and globally, requires the involvement of all stakeholders not simply governments. CONGOMA is therefore seeking new spaces for promoting this dialogue between national and regional governments and non-state actors (including NGOs) on broad poverty and economic issues.
 
C). Global Perspectives
Malawi's economy is heavily dependent on donors and this has major implications for development and poverty reduction. With a heavy debt burden of USD 2.4 billion representing 166.6% of GNP, debt servicing continues to significantly reduce government contributions to development efforts in general and to poverty alleviation in particular. It drains foreign exchange and reduces budgetary allocations to sectors that cater for the needs of the poor.
 
The process of globalisation and market liberalization have also had mixed efforts on Malawi as these have mostly involved business restructuring and outright privatisation often resulting in massive job losses and therefore increased social insecurity.
 
These developments have presented new challenges to NGO work (particularly to local NGOs) and to the sustenance of current development efforts. Most NGOs are facing a growing challenge in raising funds and mobilizing resources to finance both old and new programmes. The traditional sources of funding for NGOs is becoming ever more scarce and unpredictable partly as a result of concerns about transparency and accountability of some NGOs and partly because of the need to finance emerging development needs in other parts of the globe. In addition, the events of September 11 have shifted the focus of global resources from dealing with poverty, democracy and good governance to war against terrorism and improving domestic security. While it is becoming increasingly difficult to access external donor funding for development, national governments have little to spare as resources are taken up by debt servicing.
 
The challenge for CONGOMA and the NGOs is how to influence donor-funding policies in a way that would contribute to NGO financial sustainability. The creation of Endowment Funds with the support of the donor community, establishment of Community Foundations and encouraging Domestic Corporate Giving are some of the avenues to pursue.
 
D). Brief Overview Of Poverty In Malawi
 
1. Introduction
Malawi is classified among the world's poorest countries. Poverty in Malawi is often described as widespread, deep and severe. The UNDP HDI ranking for 1998 placed Malawi at 163 out of 174 countries. Life expectancy at birth has decreased from 52.4 years for females and 51 years for males in 1992, to 39.8 for females and 39.2 for males in 1998. It is projected to decline further largely due to the effects of HIV/AIDS. In fact, poverty has continued to worsen. The Poverty Analysis of the Integrated Household Survey published in November 2000 revealed that 65.3% of Malawi's population (over 6 million people) were living in poverty in 1998. In the more extreme case 28.7% of the population were classified as living in extreme poverty. The annual cost of eliminating poverty was estimated at MK16.67 billion (USD 325 million), at September 2000 prices.
 
A really crucial issue is that an annual GDP growth rate of at least 6% is required to reduce the absolute number of people living in poverty. However, the rate of real growth has been fluctuating over the years, averaging 2.4% in the 20 years between 1975 and 1995. It doubled to 5% from 1995 to 2000, but dropped subsequently to 3.7% in 1999 and even further to 1.7% in 2000.
 
The factors attributed to this fluctuation in growth, include: the influences of weather, (normal, droughts, floods), economic and development policies, level of engagement and performance of the public, private sector and civil society, globalisation and international trade, governance, the debt burden (level of stock and debt servicing), level of donor support and development aid. Indeed growth in the agricultural (especially smallholder), and economic sectors remains below the estimated annual 8% needed to significantly impact on the overall economic growth rate.
 
2. Meaning And Understanding Of Poverty In Malawi
In Malawi, poverty is generally considered as a condition characterized by a state of serious deprivation of basic human needs and the lack of means and opportunities to fulfil such basic needs. The MPRS summarizes this condition "…as a state of continuous deprivation or a lack of the basics of life".
 
In his speech delivered at the launch ceremony of the results of the findings of the Integrated Household Survey (on 1 December 2001), the Vice President of the Republic of Malawi, the Right Honourable Justin Malawezi, said that "poverty is a result of economic, political, and social processes that interact with each other and frequently reinforce each other in ways that exacerbate the deprivation in which poor people live"
 
He also highlighted that "poor people live without fundamental freedoms of action and choice that those who are better off take so much for granted. They often lack adequate food and shelter, education and health, deprivations that keep them from leading the kind of life that everyone values. They also face extreme vulnerability to ill health, economic dislocation, and natural disasters. And they are often exposed to ill treatment by society and are powerless to influence key decisions affecting their lives". He further stated "facilitating the empowerment of poor people - by making state and social institutions more responsive to them is also key to reducing poverty.
 
At macro level, poverty is recognized as a complex phenomenon, that hinders human development and covers issues relating to income and consumption (poverty lines and their derivatives), social well being (education, health and other social services), enabling environment (ease of access to productive assets), and empowerment (unleashing potential and securing rights).
 
In the UNDP Human Development Report of 1996, Human Development is defined as the process of enlarging people's choices. Exploring this context further, poverty can be conceptualised through various perspectives. These include: income (income levels below a defined poverty line), basic needs (lack of material resources to satisfy basic human needs such as food, health, education), basic rights (lack of the opportunity to exercise choice, self expression to access their rights and entitlements as human beings) and capability (lack of basic capabilities to function and release full potential to achieve a more successful and dignified life
 
Poverty clearly has both causes and effects and for any meaningful impact on poverty to be made, both factors need to be addressed, in a collective and concerted manner by all stakeholders, in the short, medium and long term. Causes and effects of poverty influence and reinforce each other, thereby compounding the poverty problem.
 
3. Poverty Characteristics And Effects
Some of the characteristics of Malawi's poverty and the poor include the following:
  • Regional dimension: the Southern Region is the poorest. Poverty levels significantly vary within regions. For instance, relatively very poor and relatively well -off districts can be found in the same region.
  • Rural and urban dimension: most of the poor are located in rural areas. However, although urban income levels can be said to be generally higher and access to services and amenities greater in urban settings, the number of urban poor is on the increase and in some cases such people are in greater need that the rural poor.
  • Gender dimension: Most poor households are male-headed; however female - headed households (estimated at 27.4%) are disproportionately poor.
  • Meeting food and other basic needs: in general, poor households do not meet their normal basic needs, especially food. For instance, only 34% of all households satisfy the recommended daily calorie requirements (meaning that as much as 66% do not do so).
  • Greater effects on vulnerable groups: poverty impacts more seriously on vulnerable groups. These include women, children, orphans people with disabilities and the elderly.
E). Stakeholder Responses To Poverty In Malawi
1. The Government Of Malawi
The Government of Malawi remains the biggest player and has continued to reinforce its poverty reduction and development programs. It continues to create and support a conducive policy and regulatory environment for various poverty actors. The development and recent launching of the Malawi Poverty Reduction Strategy (MPRS), is a key turning point in the Government's focus on poverty reduction. Government has substantially increased the share of the social sector, in particular health and education, from 14% in 1994/95 to 34% in 1999/2000. The enacting of the NGO Law is also a very significant development in Government-NGO relations and partnership with a view to maximizing accountability and delivery of development goals.
 
2. The Donor Community
The majority of Malawi's donors (bilateral and multilateral) continue to support and facilitate development programs run by Government's and Civil Society Organizations. Government finance is still heavily dependent on donor funding. Up to 40% of the recurrent budget and over 80% of the development budget is financed through donor grants and loans from the multilateral agencies. Donor commitment to the HIPIC initiative and the PRSP is a major opportunity to Malawi's socio-economic development. Balance of Payment support though has not been to the expected levels for 2001/02 due partly to alleged donor concerns over fiscal indiscipline and governance problems.
 
In terms of future cooperation and partnership between donors and Government, there is general consensus amongst both parties to promote sector programming - e.g. Sector Investment Programs (SIPs) and Sector Wide Approaches (SWAPs). Funding to CSOs including NGOs often reflect donor interest areas and includes development projects, human rights and governance. Sustainability of significant donor funding to CSOs remains an issue (particularly for indigenous NGOs). Certain donors have also of late been increasingly concerned about the transparency and accountability of some NGOs.
 
3. The Private Sector
The private sector accounts for about 80% of people in paid formal employment. An increasing number of businesses and institutions are contributing resources to development initiatives. Government has continued to broaden private ownership of assets and services and improve the enabling environment for private sector development by means of reducing private investment regulations and other restrictions.